What this app is
The Mutual Funds app is research software for Indian mutual funds. It reads the full AMFI NAV history — every scheme, every day, back to the beginning of each fund — and turns it into rankings, risk-adjusted ratios, rolling-return distributions and portfolio look-through, so a decision rests on a fund's whole record rather than the one trailing number a factsheet chose to print.
Three things it deliberately does not do:
- It does not sell or transact in funds. There is no buy button, no folio, no distributor relationship. Nothing you do here moves money.
- It does not recommend schemes. Rankings and scores are descriptions of what already happened, published so you can compare like with like. They are not advice.
- It does not use category averages as a stand-in for a fund. Every simulation and distribution runs on the scheme's own NAV series.
The 60-second tour
- Search any fund from the box in the top-right of the app. Results show the fund house and a “Options” expander for the Direct/Regular and Growth/IDCW variants of the same scheme.
- Open the fund page. Health score, category rank, rolling returns, sector and market-cap composition, ratios, fees, managers, holdings and peers — on one scrollable page with a jump-nav.
- Screen for what you actually want in the Fund Screener — Sortino above 1.5, down-capture under 100, expense under 1%, small-cap weight above 60%, and so on.
- Compare the shortlist in Compare Funds (up to four funds, plus benchmark indices on the same growth chart).
- Check you are not buying the same thing twice with Overlap Analysis.
- Load your own portfolio in Portfolio Monitoring and run Insights to see your true single-stock exposure across every fund you hold.
Pick your starting point
Where the data comes from
Everything in the app is derived from four sources, refreshed on a fixed schedule. All times are IST.
| Data | Source | Refresh | What it drives |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily NAVs | AMFI's published NAV files | 22:30 and 08:30 IST | Every return, ratio, rolling window, chart and portfolio valuation |
| Scheme master | AMFI scheme list + AMC metadata | Nightly | Category, plan/option, fund house, expense ratio, exit load, riskometer, managers |
| Portfolio disclosures | AMC monthly holdings disclosures | As AMCs publish (monthly, with a lag) | Holdings, sectors, overlap, market-cap style, look-through valuation |
| Index levels | Benchmark index history | Nightly | Alpha, capture ratios, beta, tracking error, index comparison on charts |
Two NAV runs a day, by design. AMFI publishes most NAVs late in the evening, and stragglers land overnight. A single 22:30 IST run catches the bulk; the 08:30 IST run picks up whatever arrived afterwards, so the app is correct before the next market day rather than a day behind.
The live counts sit in the sub-navigation strip on the Top Funds page — funds ranked, NAV points, total schemes and the latest NAV date. At the time of writing that reads roughly 8,400 ranked schemes out of 37,600 in the scheme master, over 34.6 million NAV rows.
Direct vs Regular, and the plan toggle
Every scheme exists as at least four rows: Direct/Regular × Growth/IDCW. They hold the same portfolio; what differs is cost and what happens to gains.
- Direct carries no distributor commission, so its expense ratio is lower and its NAV compounds faster than the Regular plan of the same fund.
- Growth retains gains in the NAV. IDCW (formerly “dividend”) pays them out, which resets the NAV and makes a raw NAV series look flat — which is why ranks, ratings and the Health Score are computed on Growth rows only.
The Direct plan ⇄ button in the top bar switches the whole app between Direct and Regular. It is a global preference, stored in your browser, and it drives search results, rankings, screener defaults and the goal lists. Default is Direct.
The shared fund table
Top Funds, Goals, Movers, NAV Highs & Lows, Fund Houses and the peer table on every fund page all render the same column set. One definition, one set of formatting rules — so a number never means one thing on one screen and something else on another. Click any header to sort; click any row to open the full fund analysis.
Every column explained
| Column | What it is |
|---|---|
| Fund | Scheme name with the AMC logo, and the fund house underneath. |
| Category | Two lines: the broad asset class (Equity, Debt, Hybrid, Index/ETF, Commodities, Gilt, FoF, Overseas, Solution Oriented) and the SEBI sub-category chip beneath it. Every peer-relative number in the app is ranked inside the sub-category, not across all funds. |
| Cat Rank | Position inside its category for the selected window, as
rank / category size. See below for the arrow. |
| FT Rating | FNOTrader's own 1–5★ rating, blending trailing return with risk-adjusted return and ranked against the fund's own category peers. It is not a third party's rating, and a category with fewer than five funds is not rated. |
| Health | The 0–100 composite plus its letter grade. Formula. |
| Risk | The AMC's own riskometer band, from Low through Very High. |
| AUM | Assets under management, in ₹ crore (shown as ₹L Cr above a lakh crore). |
| NAV | Latest net asset value per unit. |
| Expense | Annual expense ratio. It is charged out of NAV every year, so a 0.5% difference compounds into a real gap over a decade. |
| 1D … 10Y | Trailing returns. Up to 1Y these are absolute; 2Y and beyond are annualised (CAGR). A blank means the fund is younger than that window. |
| Alpha | The fund's return for the selected window minus its own benchmark's return over the same window, with the benchmark named beneath. Read the caveat — it is measured against a price index. |
Category rank and the arrow
Ranks are computed for 1M, 6M, 1Y and 2Y windows, among the investable set (Growth option, the plan
you have selected). The rank cell shows 12/78 — twelfth of seventy-eight funds in that
category.
On the 1Y view a small ▲ or ▼ follows the rank. That is the change in the fund's 1-year rank versus its rank a month ago: ▲5 means it climbed five places. It answers “is this fund drifting up or down among its peers” without you having to remember last month's table.
Ranks need a real peer group. A category with fewer than five funds gets no rank, rating or Health Score at all, because a percentile among three funds is noise.
Top Funds
Three views of the same universe, switched by the tabs under the page heading, with the return window and Direct/Regular plan applying to all of them.
- By Category — the top funds inside each asset class, with a sub-tab row for All / Equity / Debt / Gilt / Hybrid / Commodities / FoF / Overseas / Solution Oriented / Index & ETF. Use this when you want “the best mid caps”, not “the best funds”.
- By Performance — the full screening table across every category, with filters for category, asset class, risk band, minimum FT rating and fund house, plus a free-text table filter.
- By AUM — the same table sorted by fund size. Useful for sanity checks: a category's largest funds are usually its most liquid and least likely to be merged away.
Clicking a row opens the full fund page. The quick-peek drawer (from search) gives you the 1M–5Y returns with alpha against the benchmark, AUM, expense ratio and a NAV chart without leaving the list.
Monitor — the category heatmap
A grid of every sub-category against time, coloured by return. Rows are sub-categories grouped by asset class; cells are the average return of that category's Direct-Growth funds for the period. Four views:
| View | Columns | Reads as |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing | 1D, 1W, YTD, 1M, 3M, 6M, 1Y, 2Y, 3Y, 5Y, 10Y | Where money has been working, over every horizon at once |
| Annual | Calendar years, most recent first (up to 11) | Which categories led in which year — leadership rotates more than people remember |
| Quarterly | Last 12 quarters | Medium-term rotation |
| Monthly | Last 12 months | What has turned recently |
A category needs at least two funds with data to appear. Clicking a category name jumps to the Top Funds screener filtered to it. Filter the rows with the category search box, or narrow the whole grid to one asset class.
Movers
The top 50 funds across all categories by momentum, in three buckets. Each bucket is a weighted blend of trailing returns, and a fund must have the bucket's primary window to qualify:
| Bucket | Score | Answers |
|---|---|---|
| Emerging | 0.5 × 1M + 0.3 × 3M + 0.2 × 1W | What has started moving recently |
| Growing | 0.4 × 6M + 0.4 × 1Y + 0.2 × 3M | What has been building over the medium term |
| Outperforming | 0.4 × 3Y CAGR + 0.4 × 5Y CAGR + 0.2 × 1Y | What has compounded over the long run |
Filter by asset class to keep the comparison honest — a list mixing small-cap equity and liquid funds by raw momentum is not a shortlist, it is a market summary. Funds need at least 60 NAV points and a NAV no more than 15 days old to appear.
NAV Highs & Lows
Funds sitting at a NAV milestone right now. The thresholds are explicit rather than exact-equality, so a fund a whisker below a high still counts:
| Milestone | Condition |
|---|---|
| All-time high | NAV within 0.5% of its highest ever |
| All-time low | NAV within 0.5% of its lowest ever |
| 52-week high | NAV within 2% of its 1-year high |
| 52-week low | NAV within 2% of its 1-year low |
| New 3-year high | NAV within 1% of its 3-year high |
| New 5-year high | NAV within 1% of its 5-year high |
Only one label is assigned per fund, in priority order: all-time high, then all-time low, then 52-week high, then 52-week low. Low lists are sorted by how far the fund sits below its all-time high; high lists by AUM.
Fund Houses
Every AMC with the number of schemes it runs, total AUM and average rating, sorted by size. Pick a fund house to see its full fund list in the standard table — useful when you already hold with one AMC and want to see what else sits under the same roof, or when you are checking how deep a house is beyond its one famous scheme.
Goals
Nine plain-language groupings, each mapped to real SEBI categories and ranked on the metric that suits the goal. Multiple plan/option variants of the same fund collapse to one row, so the list is nine distinct funds rather than the same fund four times.
| Goal | Categories included | Ranked on |
|---|---|---|
| 📈 Wealth Builder | Flexi Cap, Multi Cap, Large & Mid Cap, Large Cap, Focused, Value, Contra, Dividend Yield | 5Y CAGR |
| 🚀 High Growth | Mid Cap, Small Cap | 5Y CAGR |
| 🏢 Bluechip | Large Cap | 5Y CAGR |
| 💵 Steady Income | Corporate Bond, Banking & PSU, Short/Medium Duration, Dynamic Bond, Floater, Conservative Hybrid, Equity Savings | 3Y CAGR |
| ✂ Tax Saver | ELSS | 5Y CAGR |
| 🎯 Thematic | Thematic, Sectoral | 3Y CAGR |
| 🧢 Index Funds | Index / ETF (excluding target-maturity and debt index) | AUM |
| 🅿 Park Your Money | Liquid, Overnight, Ultra Short, Money Market, Low Duration | 1Y return |
| 🏦 Debt & Bond | All Debt and Gilt categories | 3Y CAGR |
Goals is a shortcut into the right neighbourhood, not a recommendation. ELSS carries a three-year lock-in; thematic funds concentrate risk by construction; liquid funds are for parking, not growth. The category is the decision — the list just saves you mapping it by hand.
The fund page
Everything known about one scheme, on a single page with a sticky jump-nav across the top. Sections that cannot apply to a fund are dropped rather than rendered as a row of dashes — a gold or liquid fund maps to no equity benchmark, so it legitimately has no alpha, capture ratio or tracking error.
Open it from search, from any table row, or directly at /fund?code=<scheme code>.
Fund Health
A 0–100 composite scored against the fund's own category peers, shown with a letter grade and a per-dimension breakdown so you can always see why. The bars beneath the headline number are the six dimensions with their weights; hover any one to see its contribution.
Because it is peer-relative, a liquid fund scoring 85 is excellent among liquid funds — it is not making a claim against an equity fund scoring 60. Full formula →
Rank
Where the fund sits inside its category over 1M, 6M, 1Y and 2Y, alongside its rank across the whole universe. Four windows rather than one, because a fund that is 3rd over 2 years and 61st over 1 month is telling you something a single number would hide.
Performance & the NAV chart
Trailing returns from 1 day to 10 years, each shown against the fund's benchmark for the same window, with the difference in green or red. The NAV chart underneath plots the scheme's actual NAV series; on funds younger than a window, that window is simply absent.
Rolling returns
The most useful table on the page. For each horizon — 1Y, 3Y, 5Y, 7Y, 10Y — it takes every month-start in the fund's life where a complete window exists, computes the annualised return over that window, and describes the resulting distribution:
| Column | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Held for | The holding period: 1Y, 3Y, 5Y, 7Y or 10Y. |
| Windows | How many complete windows exist. A 10Y row with 14 windows is a much weaker sample than a 3Y row with 140. |
| Worst / Best | The least and most an investor got, annualised, over any window. |
| 25th pct / Median / 75th pct | The spread. A tight band means the outcome barely depended on when you started; a wide one means timing dominated. |
| Loss-making | Share of windows that ended below where they started. For a 3Y row, 0% means no 3-year investor in this fund's history finished down. |
| Beat category | Share of windows where the fund beat the median fund in its category over that same window. The comparison is window-matched, not against today's median, so it is not contaminated by hindsight. |
Read a 3Y row as: across every month in which you could have started a three-year holding, this is the range of annualised returns you would have got.
Sector exposure
The fund's disclosed equity sleeve broken down by sector, as bars, with the headline concentration underneath (“most concentrated in Financial Services at 31.4% across 14 sectors”). Percentages are of disclosed equity, and the caption states what share of the whole portfolio that equity is — a hybrid fund with 30% equity will show sector weights that sum across that 30%, not the whole fund.
Look-through valuation
What the portfolio actually trades at, computed from the fund's own holdings rather than from the fund's label: weighted portfolio P/E (a harmonic mean, which is the correct way to average a ratio across a portfolio), P/B, weighted ROE and dividend yield, plus a Cheap / Fair / Expensive chip versus its category and our own risk band. The caption states the share of the fund's equity we could match to fundamentals — if that coverage is low, treat the numbers as indicative.
Market-cap composition
Large / mid / small / other, from AMFI's classification of each individual holding (top 100 companies by market cap are large, 101–250 mid, beyond that small) weighted by the fund's own weights — not from the fund's name. The style label that follows is derived the same way.
Advanced ratios
The full risk-adjusted set, computed over up to three years. Hover any label in the app for a plain-English explanation; the same definitions are collected in the glossary. Metrics that cannot be computed for the fund are listed together at the bottom of the card with the reason, instead of appearing as blanks.
- Return vs benchmark — alpha, upside capture, downside capture, information ratio, tracking error, windows ahead, share of equity inside the benchmark.
- Risk — Sharpe, Sortino, standard deviation, beta versus Nifty 50, max drawdown over 3 years and over the fund's life, worst rolling 1-year.
- Character — fund age, FT rating, consistency score, top-5 and top-20 holding concentration.
Exit load, stamp duty & tax
What it costs to hold and to leave: the scheme's exit load in its own words, the expense ratio, the 0.005% stamp duty charged on every purchase and SIP instalment, and a note that entry loads have been abolished since 2009. A plain-English tax summary for the fund's asset class sits underneath.
Fund management
The named managers, and for each, how many other schemes they run at the same AMC with those funds listed and their 1-year returns. A manager running fourteen schemes is a different proposition from one running two, and a manager whose other funds all lag is worth noticing.
Holdings & exports
The full disclosed portfolio — stock, sector and percentage — as of the latest disclosure date, which is printed on the section. Two exports sit above the table:
- TradingView watchlist — the equity holdings as an
NSE:SYMBOLlist to paste into TradingView via Watchlist → Import. - CSV — symbols with weights, sectors and ISINs.
Cash, repo, treasury and derivative lines are excluded from equity maths (overlap, sectors, look-through) but remain visible in the disclosure itself.
Performers
The fund's holdings with each stock's own price performance across 1D to 5Y, so you can see which positions have carried the portfolio and which have dragged. Stock returns come from the FNOTrader Stocks app over an internal bridge; if that is briefly unavailable the section serves its last good data rather than blanking.
Peers
Every other fund in the same category in the standard table, with this fund pinned at the top so you can see it in context on any column you sort by. This is the fastest way to ask “is this fund's expense ratio normal for its category?” — sort by expense and look at where the pin sits.
Fund Screener
Any mix of filters, applied to the whole universe. Leave a field blank to ignore it. The results table carries the deep metrics as sortable columns, each with a hover explanation on its header.
Basics
Category, asset class, plan, minimum FT rating, Sortino, Sharpe, up-capture, down-capture, beta, expense ratio, AUM, and trailing 1Y / 3Y / 5Y returns.
Quality & consistency
Health score and grade, consistency score, rolling 3Y median, maximum share of loss-making 3Y windows, minimum share of windows beating the category, 3Y alpha, information ratio, and maximum 3-year drawdown.
Portfolio & style
Style label, valuation label, risk band, largest sector, portfolio P/E, weighted ROE, minimum large-cap or small-cap share, and maximum share of equity sitting inside the benchmark index.
Worked examples
- Downside-aware equity — Category: Flexi Cap · Down-capture ≤ 90 · Sortino ≥ 1 · Max drawdown 3Y ≥ −30.
- Genuinely active, not a closet tracker — Category: Large Cap · In benchmark ≤ 70% · Info ratio ≥ 0.5 · Expense ≤ 1.2%.
- Consistency over a hot streak — Beat category ≥ 60% · Loss-making 3Y windows = 0 · Consistency ≥ 75.
- Cheap large-cap exposure — Asset class: Index / ETF · Expense ≤ 0.25% · AUM ≥ 1000 Cr.
Compare Funds
Up to four funds side by side, plus benchmark indices as additional columns on the same growth chart — so “did this beat the index” is a line you can see rather than a subtraction you do in your head. The comparison covers returns across every window, risk ratios, expense, AUM, category rank, market-cap composition, and a rebased NAV chart over the last five years.
Add funds from the search box; the same “Options” expander lets you pin the exact plan and option variant, which matters when comparing a Direct plan against someone's Regular holding.
Overlap Analysis
Pick a main fund, add others, and see how much of their equity is literally the same stocks. Overlap is computed as the sum of the minimum weight of each stock common to both portfolios — the standard definition. If both funds hold HDFC Bank at 8% and 5%, that name contributes 5 percentage points of overlap.
| Overlap | Reads as |
|---|---|
| Under 25% | Genuinely different portfolios. |
| 25–50% | Meaningful common ground — expected between two funds in the same category. |
| Over 50% | Largely duplicate holdings. You are paying two expense ratios for close to one exposure, and diversifying less than the fund count suggests. |
The common-stock list underneath shows each shared name with both funds' weights and the overlapping portion. Funds that do not disclose equity holdings — debt, gold, fund-of-funds — are marked as unavailable rather than silently scored as zero.
Stock → Funds
The reverse lookup: type a stock and see every fund that holds it, with each fund's weight in that name and its own performance. Useful for two questions — “which managers back this company?”, and “if I already own this stock directly, which of my funds is doubling me up?”
Search understands brand names that differ from the listed entity funds disclose: Paytm resolves to One 97 Communications, Zomato to Eternal, Nykaa to FSN E-Commerce, Policybazaar to PB Fintech, and so on.
Top Stocks
The most widely held listed stocks across the entire fund universe, aggregated from every disclosed portfolio. For each: how many funds hold it, the total value that represents (each fund's AUM × its weight), the average weight, and the market-cap class. Sort by holder count to see conviction breadth, or by value to see where the money actually is. Cash, repo and derivative lines are excluded by requiring a resolvable NSE symbol.
Calculators
Two directions, three modes each.
- Reach a goal — you give the target, the app solves for the monthly SIP, the starting SIP of a step-up plan, or the lump sum required.
- Project an investment — you give the amount, the app shows what it grows to.
The modes are Monthly SIP, Step-up SIP (with an annual increase percentage, applied each twelve instalments) and Lump sum. Results break out total invested versus estimated gains, with a year-by-year chart of both lines.
The expected-return field accepts any number, or you can search a fund and pull in its historical CAGR — 5Y if available, else 3Y, else 1Y — which is labelled as such. That is a convenience for anchoring an assumption to something real. It is still an assumption: past returns do not repeat on schedule, and a projection is arithmetic, not a forecast.
Portfolio Monitoring
Load what you actually own, and the app values it daily against the NAV feed, ranks each holding inside its category, and looks through every fund to the individual stocks underneath.
Three ways to load it
| Method | What you provide | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| 📄 CAS PDF | Your consolidated account statement from
camsonline.com or kfintech.com, plus its password |
The complete picture in one step — every folio across every AMC, with units and cost |
| 📊 Excel / CSV | A sheet with scheme name and invested amount | A portfolio you already track in a spreadsheet |
| ✎ Manual entry | Search each fund, enter units held and average buy NAV | A handful of holdings, or a hypothetical portfolio you want to test |
Scheme names from a CAS or a spreadsheet are matched to the scheme master automatically; anything that cannot be matched is reported rather than dropped. Once loaded, the portfolio is saved to your account, so it is there on your next visit — and Clear portfolio removes it.
Holdings table & charts
Every holding with units, invested amount, current value, absolute and percentage P&L, the fund's category, its returns and how it ranks inside its category — a fund that is up 14% might still be in the bottom quartile of its peers, and this is where that shows. Click any row for the full fund page.
Above it: totals for invested and current value, and three charts — allocation by fund, return by fund, and asset-class mix.
Portfolio Insights
The ✨ Insights button runs the deeper pass, which is where the app earns its keep. Five blocks:
- Opportunity — what the same money in each category's best fund would be worth on a three-year view, versus your funds. Every fund's trailing 3Y CAGR applied to your invested amount. Illustrative arithmetic on past returns, not a projection.
- Your true stock exposure — each fund's latest disclosed weights, scaled by that fund's current value and summed across every fund you hold. This is where people discover that four “different” funds have quietly made one bank 9% of their net worth. The caption states what share of your portfolio could be looked through — gold, debt and fund-of-funds sleeves carry no stock disclosure.
- Sector exposure — the same look-through rolled up by sector, computed server-side from the same numbers so it can never disagree with the stock list above.
- Category rankings — each holding's rank, percentile, its 3Y return against the category median, and a verdict chip.
- Overlap between your funds — pairwise overlap for every combination you hold, flagged when it runs high.
Method & formulas
Every derived number in the app is computed here, nightly, from the NAV and holdings data. This section is the specification — if a number surprises you, this is where to check what it actually measures.
Health Score
A 0–100 composite. Each dimension is percentile-ranked within the fund's own (category, plan) peer group, then blended:
| Dimension | Weight | Measured by |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 25% | Median rolling 3-year return — not the trailing 3Y CAGR, so one lucky start date cannot carry it |
| Consistency | 20% | The consistency score (below) |
| Downside | 20% | A blend of down-capture (lower better), maximum 3-year drawdown (shallower better) and Sortino |
| Alpha | 15% | Information ratio — alpha per unit of tracking error |
| Cost | 10% | Expense ratio, lower is better |
| Stability | 10% | Fund size and track-record length |
Guards. A fund needs at least 5 peers in its category to be scored at all, and at least half the weight of the six dimensions must be computable — a fund with only two available dimensions gets no score rather than a flattering one built from what happened to exist. Percentiles are computed over funds that have the metric, so schemes missing a metric do not silently deflate everyone else's rank.
Grades: A+ ≥ 85 · A ≥ 75 · B+ ≥ 65 · B ≥ 55 · C+ ≥ 45 · C ≥ 35 · D ≥ 25 · E below 25.
Rolling returns & consistency
Month-end NAVs are indexed by absolute month, and for each horizon (1, 3, 5, 7, 10 years) every start month with a complete window produces one annualised CAGR. The distribution of those — minimum, 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile, maximum, share negative — is what the rolling table reports.
“Beat category” compares each window against the median of that category's Direct-Growth funds over the identical window, so a fund is never credited for beating a peer set measured over a different period.
The consistency score (0–100) is built mostly from how often the fund beat its category over the same rolling window, plus how rarely it lost money and how tight the spread of outcomes was.
Risk-adjusted ratios
| Metric | How it is computed |
|---|---|
| Standard deviation | Sample standard deviation of daily NAV returns over three years, annualised by √252. Needs more than 200 daily observations. |
| Downside deviation | The same, but only negative days contribute. |
| Sharpe | (trailing annualised return − 6% risk-free) ÷ standard deviation. The return term uses the best available window: 3Y, else 2Y, else 1Y. |
| Sortino | The same numerator over downside deviation — it penalises only the falls, which is closer to how losses are actually experienced. |
| Beta | Covariance of the fund's daily returns with Nifty 50, over the index's variance, on aligned dates over three years. |
| Max drawdown | The deepest peak-to-trough fall in NAV, reported over three years and over the fund's whole life. |
| Worst rolling 1Y | The worst annualised return of any 1-year window in the fund's history. |
| Risk band | Our own band, from realised 3-year volatility ranked inside the asset class (needs at least 10 peers). It is separate from the AMC riskometer, which is a regulatory classification of the mandate, not of what the fund actually did. |
Capture ratios, alpha and tracking
Each category maps to the benchmark index it is genuinely supposed to be measured against, and every benchmark-relative number uses that map.
- Upside / downside capture — the Morningstar method, on monthly returns over three years. Compound the fund's monthly returns over the months the benchmark was up, divide by the benchmark's compounded return over those same months, ×100. Above 100 on the upside means the fund beat the index on the way up; below 100 on the downside means it fell less than the index, which is the good direction. Requires at least 6 up-months and 3 down-months.
- Alpha — the fund's return minus its benchmark's over the same window (1Y, 3Y, 5Y), plus a rolling 3Y alpha median and the share of rolling windows finishing ahead.
- Tracking error — annualised dispersion of monthly excess returns. Very low tracking error on an actively priced fund is a flag, not a feature.
- Information ratio — alpha per unit of tracking error. Above 0.5 is good; above 1 is rare.
Style, valuation and index containment
- Style label — from AMFI's large/mid/small classification of each holding, weighted by the fund's own weights. The matched share is disclosed alongside.
- Look-through valuation — weighted harmonic mean P/E, plus P/B, ROE and dividend yield, from the companies the fund holds. The Cheap / Fair / Expensive chip is a rank within the fund's category, needing at least 5 peers.
- Index containment — the share of a fund's equity sitting in names that are in its own benchmark. High containment together with a low tracking error earns an Index-like chip: the fund is charging an active fee for close-to-index exposure. Either signal alone is not enough — a large-cap fund will naturally hold mostly index names.
Glossary
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| NAV | Net asset value per unit — the fund's assets minus liabilities, divided by units outstanding. Published once a day for most funds. |
| CAGR | Compound annual growth rate: the constant annual rate that turns the start value into the end value. Used for all windows of two years and longer. |
| XIRR | The internal rate of return for cashflows on irregular dates. The correct return measure for a SIP, where each instalment has been invested for a different length of time. |
| Rolling return | Returns computed from every possible start date over a window, rather than only the most recent one. A fund with a high trailing return and a wide rolling distribution was lucky in its end date. |
| Alpha | Return above (or below) the benchmark over the same period. |
| Beta | Sensitivity to Nifty 50 moves. 1 moves with the market, above 1 swings more, below 1 is steadier. |
| Sharpe ratio | Return per unit of total volatility. Higher is better; above 1 is good. |
| Sortino ratio | Like Sharpe, but only downside volatility is penalised. |
| Information ratio | Alpha per unit of tracking error. |
| Tracking error | How far a fund's returns drift from its benchmark's, annualised. |
| Capture ratio | Share of the benchmark's gains (or losses) the fund captured in the months the benchmark rose (or fell). |
| Max drawdown | The deepest peak-to-trough fall. What holding it felt like at the worst moment. |
| Expense ratio | Annual cost charged out of NAV. Direct plans exclude distributor commission and therefore cost less than Regular plans of the same fund. |
| Exit load | A charge on redemption within a stated period, deducted from proceeds. |
| AUM | Assets under management — the total value the scheme runs. |
| Overlap | The shared portion of two funds' equity portfolios, summed as the minimum weight of each common holding. |
| Look-through | Resolving funds down to the individual stocks they hold, so exposure is measured at the company level rather than the fund level. |
| Closet index fund | An actively priced fund whose portfolio sits almost entirely inside its benchmark and barely deviates from it. |
| IDCW | Income Distribution cum Capital Withdrawal — the current name for the dividend option. Payouts reduce NAV. |
| Riskometer | The AMC's regulatory risk label, from Low to Very High. Distinct from our realised-volatility risk band. |
| Point-in-time | A calculation that at each date uses only what was knowable then. Ranking funds on today's data and backtesting that list is hindsight, not history. |
Limits & caveats
Things worth knowing before you lean on a number:
- Holdings are disclosed monthly, with a lag. Sector exposure, overlap, style and look-through all describe the last published portfolio, not today's. The as-of date is printed on every section that uses them.
- Look-through coverage is partial. Gold, debt, international and fund-of-funds sleeves carry no stock-level disclosure. The covered share is always stated; treat the rest as unclassified rather than absent.
- Peer-relative numbers only mean something inside a peer group. A Health Score, FT rating, risk band or valuation label compares a fund with its category. Across categories they are not on one scale.
- Alpha is against a price index — see the caveat above.
- Young funds show fewer metrics. Ratios needing three years of daily data, or six up-months against a benchmark, simply do not appear rather than being computed from too little.
- Returns are historical. Nothing here is a forecast, and past performance does not indicate future returns. Calculator projections are arithmetic on an assumption you supplied.
- Category averages hide dispersion. The Monitor grid describes categories; the gap between the best and worst fund inside one is frequently wider than the gap between two categories.
Search, themes & account
- Fund search sits in the top bar on every page. Type two characters or more; results show the scheme with its fund house, and Options ▾ expands the Direct/Regular and Growth/IDCW variants of the same fund so you land on the exact one you hold.
- Plan toggle — switches the whole app between Direct and Regular. See above.
- Themes — Light, Blue and Dark, cycled from the theme button. Light is the default and the choice is remembered per browser. It is never driven by your operating system setting.
- Explore apps — switches to any other FNOTrader app you have access to, without signing in again.
- Account menu — your plan and validity, subscription management, referrals, this guide, and sign-out. Signing out here signs you out of every FNOTrader app.
AI access (MCP)
Mutual fund research is also exposed to AI assistants over the Model Context Protocol at mcp.fnotrader.com, so you can ask an assistant to run the analysis conversationally. The mutual fund tools cover scheme search and details, NAV history, SIP and lump-sum simulation, rolling returns, multi-fund comparison, and point-in-time momentum rotation backtests — where at every rebalance the ranking uses only what was knowable on that date.
It is a research surface: it reads and computes, and has no ability to transact. It is a separate subscription from the app (Mutual Fund Analysis, ₹599/mo excluding GST). Connect at mcp.fnotrader.com/mcp/connect.
FAQ
Can I buy or redeem funds here?
No. FNOTrader is research software. We are not a distributor, not a broker for funds, and we hold no authority over your folios. Transactions happen with your AMC, RTA or distributor.
Is this investment advice?
No. Sukrisa Technologies LLP is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser or research analyst. Rankings, scores and screens are descriptions of historical data, published so you can compare funds on a consistent basis.
How current is the data?
NAVs refresh twice daily, at 22:30 and 08:30 IST, from AMFI's published files. Holdings refresh as AMCs publish their monthly disclosures. The latest NAV date is shown in the sub-navigation on Top Funds.
Why does a fund show no Health Score or rating?
Either its category has fewer than five funds, or too few of the six scoring dimensions could be computed for it — typically a fund younger than three years. We would rather show nothing than a score built from two metrics.
Why is a fund's alpha missing?
Benchmark-relative measures need an index to compare against. Commodity, some debt and several fund-of-fund categories map to no equity benchmark, so alpha, capture ratios, tracking error and containment are legitimately absent for them.
Are your ratings the same as the ones on fund websites?
No. The FT rating is our own: it blends trailing return with risk-adjusted return and ranks the result against the fund's category peers, so it will not always agree with a third party's rating. Where the two disagree it is usually because the peer group, the windows or the risk measure differ.
Should I pick the fund with the highest Health Score?
The score compresses six dimensions into one number, which is useful for shortlisting and useless as a decision. Open the fund page and look at the breakdown: two funds scoring 78 can get there from opposite directions — one cheap and steady, one expensive with strong alpha.
My portfolio shows a fund I cannot see anywhere else.
Scheme names in a CAS or spreadsheet are matched against the AMFI scheme master. If a name cannot be matched, the import reports it rather than dropping it silently — search the fund and add it manually with units and average NAV.
Is my portfolio data private?
A saved portfolio is stored against your account and is visible only to you. A CAS PDF is parsed in the request; the file and its password are not retained.
What does the app cost?
₹299/month excluding 18% GST, with a 7-day free trial and no card required to start. Live pricing is at fnotrader.com/#pricing.
Support
The support widget inside the app reaches us directly — raise an issue or request a feature from any screen, and it lands with the team along with the page you were on. Broader platform questions are answered in the FNOTrader FAQ, and terms live in the glossary.
Other FNOTrader guides
Every app documents itself the same way. All of these are public and need no login: